Author name: Musab Qazi

This article explores the logical fallacy of declaring ‘the moon is too big’ as proof of anything. The Flawed Logic: – Big moons mean earlier Eid was correct – This […]

“You scholars are inconsistent!” “You reject evolutionary science, dismiss calculation based Islamic calendars, but suddenly champion science when using astronomical calculations to negate witness testimony.” The Real Issue: Understanding the

Frustrated by conflicting Eid announcements? Invest just 5 minutes, and you’ll walk away with clarity that cuts through the noise. This isn’t just another article – this is your key

Let me begin by saying I’m genuinely surprised this objection comes up as often as it does. I hope this explanation helps clarify why these categories are fundamentally different –

Do you need a PhD in astronomy to evaluate moon sightings. Nope. All you need is one simple fact and a bit of common sense. We Only Need One Simple

Allah Ta‘ala created the world with built-in laws that inevitably pull humanity back toward divine guidance as the only stable regulator. Human nature cannot escape the consequences of deviating from

Recent comments by Dr. Yasir Qadhi regarding Islamic epistemology have generated significant discussion within the Muslim community. His characterization of Islamic approaches to hadith as requiring “leaps of faith” creates confusion among believers rather than providing clarity. This analysis demonstrates that Islamic epistemology operates through systematic evidence evaluation rather than the “faith-based” methodology described in his presentations, and that this approach is not only rationally sound but demonstrates clear advantages over Western academic approaches.